Privacy Concerns Regarding the Electronic Tolling Proposed in: H.B. 5046, H.B. 5391, H.B. 5393, S.B. 389

  • Status: Failed
  • Position: Needs amendments
  • Bill Number: H.B. 5046, H.B. 5391, H.B. 5393, S.B. 389
  • Session: 2018
  • Latest Update: March 15, 2018
Placeholder image

Without proper protections, electronic tolling systems could jeopardize people's privacy rights. The ACLU of Connecticut weighed in on these bills regarding electronic tolling in order to raise serious privacy issues and suggest amendments to help protect people's rights.

Though each of these bills is directed at a different aspect of establishing an electronic tolling system in Connecticut, the ACLU of Connecticut weighed in on them collectively in order to raise serious privacy issues surrounding electronic tolling and suggest amendments that could help to protect people's rights.

People should not have to choose between moving freely in public and protecting their civil liberties. Without proper protections, electronic tolling systems could jeopardize people's privacy rights. The ACLU of Connecticut has serious concerns that automatic license plate reader (ALPR) systems installed on electronic tolls could be used by the government in ways that violate the First and Fourth Amendments. ALPR systems can open the door to retroactive surveillance of innocent drivers without a warrant, probable cause, or judicial oversight. In addition, ALPR databases could be ripe for abuse by the federal government. In 2018, Vigilant Solutions, a company that has contracted with the Connecticut Capitol Area Police Association to provide the region's license plate reader database, announced that it had signed an agency-wide contract to provide federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) with access to its full database of license plate reader scans, leaving immigrants in Connecticut vulnerable to surveillance and targeting by ICE.

No results.

Why we're worried about electronic tolls in Connecticut

This week, Governor Malloy issued an executive order requiring the state Department of Transportation to conduct a $10 million study of electronic tolling on Connecticut roads. Missing from that executive order? Any mention of people’s privacy rights.

By David McGuire

Placeholder image

I’m a Hartford resident and an ACLU-CT staff member. Mass surveillance threatens people in my city.

In December, the Hartford City Council gave the go-ahead for the city to apply for a $2.5 million grant to expand police surveillance in Connecticut’s capital city. This grant would enable Hartford police to purchase two high-powered drones and to expand Hartford’s existing police surveillance network.

By Melvin Medina

Hartford Connecticut street surveillance camera and Hartford Has It red sign

Mass surveillance? Hartford could have it.

The Hartford City Council approved a grant to allow city police to expand surveillance camera and drone programs. Separately, these programs threaten civil liberties. Together, they could be a nightmare for anyone who cares about safety, justice, equality, and freedom in the capital city.

By David McGuire

Placeholder image