In 2017, the ACLU of Connecticut helped to pass new criminal justice reform, cellphone privacy, and LGBT rights laws. We brought legal challenges on behalf of a Bridgeport music minister who was illegally searched by police, a protester whose First and Fourth Amendment rights were violated by state police, and a Cromwell police officer whose employers discriminated against her when she became pregnant. Learn more about the ACLU of Connecticut's work in our Fall 2017 newsletter.
The ACLU of Connecticut Civil Liberties Update: Fall 2017
ADVANCING EQUALITY: ONE WOMAN'S STORY
When Cromwell police officer Sarah Alicea found out she was pregnant, she and her husband were thrilled. Their joy, however, soon gave way to worry and frustration. When Sarah told her employer, the Town of Cromwell, about her pregnancy, the Town denied her the chance to keep working and forced her to immediately take unpaid leave.
Previously a police officer in New London, Sarah has worked for four years in the Cromwell department as a patrol officer and during the academic year serves as a school resource officer. Her husband is a combat-wounded veteran, and she is her family’s primary breadwinner. When she notified the Cromwell police chief and town manager of her pregnancy and the physical restrictions imposed by her doctor, the Town refused to discuss a temporary alternative job assignment, and instead forced her to take immediate leave without pay. In contrast, the Town assures that officers injured on the job who are not able to perform their usual duties still receive their full salaries.
Forcing a pregnant worker to take immediate unpaid leave is not just unfair-it is also illegal discrimination. Federal law requires covered employers, including public employers such as police departments, to treat pregnant workers the same way they treat other workers who are “similar in their ability or inability to work,” while Connecticut law goes even further, requiring employers to “make a reasonable effort to transfer a pregnant employee to any suitable temporary position which may be available.” Sarah proposed numerous law enforcement duties she could have performed safely while pregnant, but the Town rejected those alternatives.
In August, the ACLU-CT and the national ACLU together filed a pregnancy discrimination charge against the town of Cromwell on Sarah's behalf. This case, in addition to seeking justice for Sarah Alicea, is fundamentally about a woman’s right to equally participate in society. A woman’s employer should never discriminate against her for choosing to grow or start a family. If having a baby means losing a paycheck, the field will never be even for women in the workforce. We are honored to represent Sarah in her quest for justice.
THREE WAYS ACLU-CT ADVOCATES PUSHED FOR PROGRESS AND DEFEND CIVIL LIBERTIES
1) If Connecticut values a democracy in which everyone is treated equally, we need strong police accountability laws. After an ACLU-CT investigation found police departments were not following state rules for accepting misconduct complaints, our supporters took action: more than 100 gathered in Hartford to become police accountability advocates, more than 50 submitted testimony to support a bill to fix the police complaint process, and our action network sent more than 3,400 emails for police reform bills. With voices calling for change, we will keep striving for police accountability.
2) Solitary confinement is ineffective, expensive, and cruel. This year, solitary confinement survivors, family members, faith leaders, the ACLU-CT, and more called on the legislature to stop solitary in our state. Together, we brought a replica prison cell to the capitol building to educate legislators, and solitary survivors bravely spoke at hearings. Although the legislature only passed a portion of what we called for, our work isn't done: we'll keep fighting to stop solitary in Connecticut.
3) Hundreds of people have stepped up to become new volunteers with the ACLU-CT. After participating in a special training about free speech, protesters' rights, and documenting police practices, some of them became ACLU-CT legal observers. These volunteers protected the First Amendment at protests throughout the state, defending the rights of everyone from workers calling for a $15 minimum wage, to Bridgeport residents demanding police accountability, to people supporting immigrants' rights.
GUARDING LIBERTY
When police violated two people's rights to protest and freedom from unreasonable searches, we sued.
After a music minister and a protester were illegally searched by police, they both called the ACLU-CT. In 2015, Woody Vereen, a music minister, was driving his young sons to get ice cream after a Little League game when he was pulled over by Bridgeport police. Although he had done nothing wrong and did not consent to a search, police removed him from his car, frisked, and detained him, all in full view of his frightened sons and without his consent. We sued on his behalf, and in July, we reached a settlement with the City of Bridgeport.
"This agreement sent a message that the Fourth Amendment still matters in Connecticut," said Dan Barrett, legal director of the ACLU-CT and the attorney representing Vereen in his case.
“One of the reasons I filed this lawsuit was to show people who feel they don’t have a voice, or the means to get help, that it’s possible to get justice,” Vereen said after the settlement. “No matter who we are, we all have rights, and I am grateful to the ACLU of Connecticut for opening up the avenues of justice for me and my family.”
Several months after Bridgeport police trampled on Woodrow Vereen's freedom from unreasonable searches, three Connecticut state police troopers violated Michael Picard's rights to property, protest, and record information--and accidentally filmed themselves in the process.
In September of 2015, Picard was protesting near a police DUI checkpoint in West Hartford. A state police trooper approached him under the pretext of public complaints. The trooper confiscated Picard’s legally-carried pistol and pistol permit, wrongfully claimed that filming the police is illegal, and took Picard’s camera.
Unbeknownst to the trooper or his two colleagues, the camera was recording when he brought it back to his coworker's cruiser. With the camera rolling, three state police officers recorded themselves discussing a previous protest that Picard had organized at the state capitol, and conspiring to fabricate charges against him.
After one trooper announced “we gotta cover our ass,” another stated “let’s give him something,” and the three settled on fabricating two criminal infraction tickets that they issued to Picard. Those bogus criminal charges against Picard were dismissed in the Connecticut Superior Court.
We sued to stand up for Picard's First and Fourth Amendment rights, and his case is moving forward.
“Community members like me have a right to film government officials doing their jobs in public, and we should be able to protest without fearing political retribution from law enforcement,” said Picard when his case was filed. “By seeking to hold these three police officers accountable, I hope that I can prevent the same thing from happening to someone else.”
PROMOTING JUSTICE: NINE REFORMS MOVE STATE IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION
Mass incarceration is a blight on our country and state. It is fraught with racial injustice, and it has failed to live up to our Constitution's promise of equal treatment under the law. With advocacy from the ACLU-CT and more, however, Connecticut is leading the nation on criminal justice reform. These efforts are working: the state's prison population is at its lowest in decades. This year, we pushed Connecticut to keep taking steps to end mass incarceration, honor human rights, and create second chances for people re-entering society after prison. Each step of the way, the ACLU-CT and our supporters were there: we told legislators to stop solitary confinement and place themselves in prisoners' shoes by stepping inside of a replica solitary confinement cell that we brought to the capitol, raised the alarm about civil asset forfeiture, testified about the need for second chances, and lobbied for an end to an unjust bail system.
Ultimately, the state adopted nine new reform laws, including those to prevent discrimination against formerly incarcerated people in their applications for licenses to become barbers and hairdressers, stop solitary confinement of youth under the age of 18, and end cash bail for most people accused of misdemeanor crimes.
These new laws move Connecticut closer to justice, but we still have work to do. Our state is second worst in the country when it comes to disproportionately placing Black men in solitary confinement. Too many barriers remain for people reentering society after prison. Next year, we will keep fighting to end mass incarceration, eliminate racial disparities in our justice system, and create a justice system that lives up to the promises of our Constitution.
STOPPING GOVERNMENT ABUSE: CONNECTICUT TAKES A STAND AGAINST CIVIL ASSET FORFEITURE
Civil asset forfeiture allows the government to take and sell someone’s property without ever charging them with a crime. It incentivizes policing for profit, disproportionately harms innocent people of color, and frequently violates the Constitution.
Taking innocent people’s assets is unacceptable, but it was happening in Connecticut. From 2009 to 2013, there were more than 3,700 civil asset forfeiture cases in our state.
This year, we successfully advocated for legislation to fix civil asset forfeiture in our state. Under a proposal signed into law by Governor Malloy and passed on unanimous votes in the state House of Representatives and Senate, law enforcement will only be allowed to take and keep property that was related to a criminal conviction. With these changes, Connecticut became the third New England state, and the fourteenth state in the country, to require criminal convictions in all or most property forfeiture cases under state law.
Citing the new law's strong support from liberal and conservative legislators alike, ACLU-CT executive director David McGuire called the new law "a welcome sign that people from all sides of the political spectrum will not tolerate policing for profit in our state.”
Unfortunately, the federal government can also use civil asset forfeiture. In one high-profile case, the IRS seized tens of thousands of dollars from the owners of Vocatura's Bakery in Norwich, but never charged them with a crime. U.S. Attorney General Jeff Sessions has signaled that he wants to ramp up federal asset forfeiture, and a loophole in Connecticut's laws could still allow the state to confiscate innocent people's property through the federal asset forfeiture program.
Next year, we will be fighting to close this gap and prevent state and local law enforcement from making an end-run around the Constitution's protections from unreasonable search and seizure.
All Documents
Related Content
Stopping Civil Asset Forfeiture
Civil asset forfeiture allows the government to take and sell someone’s property without ever charging them with a crime. Taking innocent people’s assets is unacceptable and unconstitutional, but it is happening in Connecticut. From 2009 to 2013, there were more than 3,700 civil asset forfeiture cases in our state. In 2017, we successfully advocated for legislation to fix civil asset forfeiture in our state. Under a proposal signed into law by Governor Malloy, the state will only be allowed to confiscate property that was related to a criminal conviction.
Stay Informed
Sign up to be the first to hear about how to take action.
By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy statement.
By completing this form, I agree to receive occasional emails per the terms of the ACLU’s privacy statement.