All Cases

6 Court Cases
Court Case
Apr 02, 2026
Wooden gavel
  • Criminal Legal System

Ebron v. Lamont

Since 2015, Connecticut lawmakers have grappled with the ramifications of sentencing young people to years—sometimes decades in prison. That year, the legislature passed a law that expanded parole eligibility to children under the age of eighteen. Then, in 2023, it passed a law that extended eligibility to people who committed a crime under the age of twenty-one. Originally, the bill was straightforward, anyone who committed a crime under twenty-one could be eligible for youth-based parole. But it was amended: the version that passed limited eligibility to people who were sentenced before October 1, 2005. This law was designed to expand youth-based parole eligibility, but the addition of this arbitrary cut-off works against that intention. Instead of being able to tell their story and potentially return home, an entire group of people is denied that opportunity based on an arbitrary date. That kind of legislative line drawing is unconstitutional. In April 2026, the ACLU Foundation of Connecticut sued on behalf of Brian Ebron, who is not eligible for parole solely because he was sentenced in 2007. The lawsuit contends that Mr. Ebron’s exclusion from consideration for parole violates his rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. This is because the October 1, 2005, sentencing date cut-off is arbitrary and irrational: it doesn’t track sentencing reforms (those came after 2010, per a lawmaker’s own floor statement), doesn’t align with brain science, doesn’t reduce costs, and — critically — worsens racial disparities in sentencing.
Court Case
Mar 14, 2022
A photo of Teresa Beatty, with short blond hair and black shirt, smiling. To the right it says: I am speaking out bc I don't want anyone else to go through what I'm going through. It's not just about me it's about the 10s of thousands of people ..."
  • Criminal Legal System

Beatty v Lamont

Connecticut residents are suing to eliminate Connecticut’s prison debt law.
Court Case
Apr 30, 2021
A blue Constitution of the United States, published by the ACLU, sits on a table under white headphones
  • LGBTQIA+ Rights|
  • +1 Issue

Clark v Department of Correction

By denying our client gender-affirming medical care that she needs, the DOC and Attorney General’s office are threatening her life and health, and they're violating federal law. We’re in court to ensure that transgender people who are incarcerated are able to get the gender-affirming care they need.
Court Case
Feb 04, 2021
A photo of a bed and desk in a cell at Northern Correctional Institution in Somers, Connecticut. A metal cot-like bed is against a concrete wall on the right. On the left, a small desk and door. The space is small, barren, concrete.
  • Criminal Legal System|
  • +1 Issue

Disability Rights Connecticut v Department of Correction

With our partners, the ACLU-CT sued the Connecticut Department of Correction (DOC) for its continuing physical and psychological abuse of people with mental illness incarcerated in DOC prisons and jails.
Court Case
Apr 03, 2020
Placeholder image
  • Criminal Legal System

Connecticut Criminal Defense Lawyers Association et al v Lamont and Cook

The ACLU of Connecticut, representing the Connecticut Criminal Defense Lawyers Association (CCDLA) and people who are incarcerated, filed a lawsuit in Superior Court seeking emergency action to prevent the spread of COVID-19 by reducing the number of people who are incarcerated in Connecticut.
Court Case
Aug 13, 2019
Placeholder image
  • Criminal Legal System

Williams v Murphy (amicus brief)

The ACLU of Connecticut filed a friend of the court brief arguing that federal law forbids Connecticut from discounting a prison abuse judgment against one of its employees even if the judgment has no punitive damages within it.