On December 19, 2008 the US District Court of Connecticut ruled to uphold a ban on lobbyists making campaign contributions, despite ACLU of Connecticut arguments that the law chills free speech. Mark Lopez, who argued the case for the ACLU, expects to appeal the decision, “We’re disappointed, because the law broadly restricts the rights of a very large group of citizens in a way that is largely unprecedented in the United States.”
Advocates and minor parties are still waiting for a decision on the legitimacy of campaign finance rules that discriminate against third party candidates. The ACLU is challenging the law that arbitrarily makes it easier for major party candidates to run for office, while imposing more hefty burdens for minor party candidates to qualify for public financing.
Judge Upholds Ban on Lobbyists' Speech: ACLU Expects to Appeal
Related content
ACLU Appeals to Supreme Court on Green Party's behalf
December 15, 2010Appeals Court Overturns Part Of 2005 Law
July 13, 2010Judge Rules Connecticut Campaign Finance Law Unconstitutional
August 28, 2009ACLU-CT Files Federal Lawsuit Challenging State Campaign Finance Law
June 6, 2006Libertarian Party v. Merrill
December 30, 2015
Know Your Rights: College and University Student Protests
May 1, 2025
The American Civil Liberties Union Sends Open Letter to Colleges...
April 21, 2025
ACLU of Connecticut Sends Rejoinder to Suffield Library About Book...
March 20, 2025